perverse dynamics
Still on separations. I'm reading a book much fun that is also the end of a relationship. It carried an excerpt because it seems perfect to describe the horrible non-dialogue sequences that have no other effect than to produce venom on venom:
" When I do these things, like Starting in the fourth for arguing and then give up, converting the impulse to resentment in the offensive struggle, I find myself trapped in that particular kind of unproductive conflict, an aesthetic, in which we put it all to show that the other does not, however, bear remains there. Which is a situation typically double: instead of sending to fuck your spouse, keep the muzzle. Basically, freeze the conflict. You put it in the freezer, to the cells below, and you need the cooling compartment daily until one fine morning the separation is not the only one you can defrost. The people are separated for defrosting the conflict much more often than you think. Because at some point you to end the cold war. We must make something happen, finally. So that people, when they separate, people are not stupid, it turns out so foolishly determined not to give in to a spouse, and is stonewalling on everything. The separation, once started, it produces virtually unstoppable chain reaction. Become a bias. A figure of speech delay in the words that you should not say that time when you came. " (Diego De Silva, I did not realize anything , pp. 220-221).
0 comments:
Post a Comment