At the 38-th coglionazzo, or the umpteenth post the newspaper censorship on what should be a discussion forum where all comments that respect the rules of the disclaimer is published, I decided to publish elsewhere. I hope to have a successor
Post censored on 18 February 2011, reported the following article
http://www.ilgiornale.it/interni/i_nuovi_cable_wikileaks_il_cav_fa_molte_gaffe__ma_americani_resta_alleato_prezioso/politica-berlusconi-governo-usa-obama-cable-wikileaks-repubblicait-spogli -ambasciata-top_secret-putin/18-02-2011/articolo-id = 506876-0-page = comments = 1
When you are pointing at the moon, you have such an ability to look at the finger if I think that you're in good faith to do wrong, because I would feel too stupid. I read the cablegrams of Wikileaks. Spogli makes political evaluations of Berlusconi Travaglio which even in a state of grace could do it. "Insistence on putting personal interests," "frequent use of public resources to gain electoral advantage," you seem positive political considerations? And then, also the key to understanding quell'appoggio recommended that the ambassador, is really disheartening for us Italians. When Spogli said "we favor that Berlusconi is a strong ally" is clear that, like a good neocon, I mean that Berlusconi is one that promotes American interests. As we all should remember the families of our soldiers died in Iraq. Interest only and exclusively American. But it is the judiciary? inefficient and self-referential. Casserole dish!
